Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Andy OHalek's avatar

So I’m an admitted Bears fan. Living in Madison, WI for the past 15 years I’ve followed the Packers too. I don’t hate them and only root against them when they’re playing the Bears (which hasn’t exactly been favorable for me). Ty agree with most of what you said except many of the players on the roster are lifted up by Rodgers in my opinion and wouldn’t be stars or even really good with other QBs. Rodgers has always been petulant and his performance has outweighed the headaches. Additionally, if Packers thought Love was good enough they wouldn’t be publicly begging. It may be time to move on from an untenable relationship but I suspect they take a bigger step backward than you’re eluding to. Rodgers is a multiplier, makes offensive players better while taking pressure off defense to be perfect. Not sure Love (or any first time starter) can replace that in the next 2-3 season.

Expand full comment
Bryan Jensen's avatar

Totally agree. The “worst way” comment was too far for me, completely reeked of desperation. It moves the conversation from Rodgers gives us our best chance to we have no chance without Rodgers. I think that does have a negative impact on the other players since you are basically saying they are not good enough without an all-time great QB. If Trent Dilfer and Rex Grossman can be the QBs of Super Bowl teams, then I think the Packers could be too without Rodgers. There is the saying that a great QB makes those around him better, but I do wonder if not having a great QB makes the team rally together because there isn’t that one person that will win the game for them.

Also, if Rodgers goes on Mayne’s show and denies all this and says it’s made up, I will have even less respect for him. There is clearly something there, the Packers have affirmed it. Don’t insult my intelligence with anything less than honesty.

Expand full comment
3 more comments...

No posts