Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Adam G.'s avatar

I'm not a Bills fan first and foremost, but to me this year should be judged differently than others. This is a team that was 6-6 at one point. They finished strong (or strong enough to win 5 straight, most by slim margins), but it never was a juggernaut. That No. 2 seed was a bit of a mirage, and KC is still KC, defending champions, and wouldn't be surprised a bit if they take down the Ravens this week too. This was different from a year ago when Cincinnati just punked what was supposed to be a better Buffalo team in its own house.

As far as Sunday, I don't know what the head coach is supposed to do differently. Allen threw some bombs; receivers dropped them or (on the one play late) it didn't work because of pressure. Allen ran the ball 12 times, so he wasn't being held back. Their run-pass ratio was the same as Kansas City's. Diggs was targeted eight times; only three were completed. The run defense was poor but the bigger point is the defense is not that talented. That sounds like the real issue, and a personnel issue and that's fine. But unless the coach 'is' the GM, that's on the GM or scouting at least as much as the coach.

I can see wanting Allen to have a few more weapons. But the defense needs a major talent infusion, and from afar it looks like those draft misses are hurting more than anything else.

Expand full comment
Clint DePew's avatar

The last set of downs by the Bills offense in the latest KC game really illustrates Ty’s argument for me. A FG there is unfathomable given the time left on the clock. If Josh is truly “unlocked” you let him take the deep shot on 2nd down but when that misses you tell him he still has two downs. It just felt like Josh knew that if they didn’t get the first on 3 and 9 that McD was gonna kick the FG, so he ignored the under route by Kincaid. The message should be clear, “we’re going for the win.” Instead they played not to lose and lost. Again.

Expand full comment
26 more comments...

No posts