Discussion about this post

User's avatar
krk's avatar

Tyler,

I greatly appreciate your writing...it is fantastic...but you (and your buddy Bob) have a tendency overly pick bones with anything to do with Rodgers. You highlight bad games, ignore good performances, and moreover do not showing great objectivity on anything involving him. He played pretty well last night under pretty good pass pressure.

Further, before Gutey takes a bow, lets examine the following:

1. Per an excellent writer, "The GM has not been perfect. His miscalculation at cornerback could haunt. Keisean Nixon struggled this night. "

YA THINK!!! Other than Hobbs and Nixon, what did you think of play Mrs. Lincoln!!!

We have a GLARING WEAKNESS AT THE POSITION, and we just spent $48mm on what appears to be a dud (although I hope is simply banged up) His OL addition, Banks has been pedestrian to this point. So that is two big spends that did not met needs in free agency. To be fair the Jacobs signing was excellent and McKinney has underwhelmed this year.

2. You opined "Rodgers never relied heavily on this position, but his QB equals have." Which ones was he to rely upon? When he had good ones, he did use them well, most of the guys were mediocre at best...or said differently, how many did squat with anyone else...to wit:

• Donald Lee (2008–2010) - meh

• Jermichael Finley (2008–2013) Rodgers used him well until his neck injury

• Tom Crabtree (2010–2012) -meh

• Andrew Quarless (2010–2015) meh

• Richard Rodgers (2014–2017) – Rodgers used him, but the dude would not/could not block

• Jared Cook (2016): Rodgers used him….Brass would not resign him

• Lance Kendricks (2017) - meh

• Jimmy Graham (2018–2019) – was done when signed with the Packers

• Marcedes Lewis (2018–2022) – not a receiving threat

QED

Finally, if we look at the pick garnered from the trade, Gutey would get a C-, D+

• DE Lukas Van Ness (No. 13 overall) - did not start in college and we can all see why

• TE Luke Musgrave (42) - a dud at this point

• LB Edgerrin Cooper (45) - a definite maybe, a very good game last night, but that was the first all year

• S Evan Williams (111) - decent

• OL Jacob Monk (163) - nothing yet

• K Anders Carlson (207) - no opinion necessary

QED II

Golden has been the first first rounder in his tenure who has made a meaningful contribution. First rounders should start immediately, not take years to develop.

So, yay the Packers played will, but we have holes in the second most position on the field and the Wyatt injury showed lack of depth at DT as well. Roster construction needs to be improved.

Keep up the awesome work. My subscription is the best money I spend

Expand full comment
Sam Hartman's avatar

I think it's a little unfair to evaluate all of these decisions purely after the fact, when a lot of luck is involved.

Jordan Love was considered at best the 3rd or 4th best QB in his draft class if I remember correctly. Now, maybe Gutenkunst is way better than average at picking QB's. But IMO, the lot likely outcome is that he's fine at it and they happened to get a great player. This pick looks like a huge blunder if he plays like a typical 4th QB off the board.

The Jacobs signing is also suspect. Most advanced stats have him as a below average efficiency back in about half of his seasons. He's the sort of player that has been great in fantasy, but that has been overrated due to consistently high volume. Giving that kind of player a market-setting contract screams overpay.

Look, all respect to the Packers for pulling this off. But when you hit 90th percentile outcomes on a bunch of your major decisions, I think it's fair to ask if it's skill or luck that's the main factor.

Expand full comment
8 more comments...

No posts