Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Robert's avatar

It’s not very exciting to hear people who haven’t thought about the overtime rules for more than 24 hours be extremely confident they know what the correct answer is to receiving vs deferring when the people who have actually spent quite a bit of time thinking about it think it’s a toss-up. Andy Reid had been conservative all night, the defense was gassed, and if you can hold the team with 4 FGs and 1 TD to a FG, getting the ball first has a big advantage.

The whole talk of granting an extra down feels very strange too: you *always* have four downs in football. While kicking a field goal makes them less likely to kick a field goal on 4th down, there are plenty of situations where they would kick one anyway, or else be stuck having to convert a 4th and long—which is not, as you seem to suggest, an obviously bad situation where the team that was 10/20 on 3rd and 4th down is magically guaranteed to convert. This seems much more like reading a narrative backwards than it is actually considering what would or would not have been a good decision.

Expand full comment
Baron Aardvark's avatar

Shanahan did not make an “incorrect” decision. He took a calculated risk that didn’t pay off.

This is a column worthy of an AM radio hack, who always knows EXACTLY what every coach should have done…the day after it happened.

Expand full comment
5 more comments...

No posts